Will give brainliest!!
Explain an example of a Progressive reform at either the local, state, or national level in each of the following areas:

Political
Social
Economic
How did the Progressive movement affect the election of 1912?

The most serious blow to Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam policy was the Tet Offensive of 1968.

This was a major military operation launched by the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces against South Vietnam and the United States. The offensive was unexpected and caught the US and South Vietnamese forces off guard. The offensive lasted for several months and resulted in heavy casualties on both sides.

The Tet Offensive was a turning point in the Vietnam War and had a significant impact on US public opinion and political support for the war. Prior to the offensive, the US government had portrayed the war as being under control and progress was being made towards victory.

However, the Tet Offensive exposed the reality of the war, that it was far from being won. The media coverage of the offensive showed the public the brutal reality of the war, and the high cost of American lives.

The Tet Offensive also shattered the US government's credibility and trust with the American people. The offensive had revealed that the US government had been misleading the public about the progress of the war and the military situation on the ground.

This revelation led to a loss of faith in the Johnson administration and the government's ability to manage the war.

In conclusion, the Tet Offensive of 1968 was the most serious blow to Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam policy. It exposed the reality of the war to the American people, shattered their trust in the government, and led to a significant decline in political support for the war effort.

For more question on policy visit:

https://brainly.com/question/20444496

#SPJ11

President Franklin D. Roosevelt withheld support for League of Nations' condemnation of Japanese and German aggression in 1933 to prioritize domestic economic issues and maintain neutrality.

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's primary concern in 1933 was dealing with the economic challenges of the Great Depression and implementing his New Deal policies to revive the U.S. economy. This domestic focus influenced his decision to withhold support for the League of Nations' condemnation of Japanese and German aggression.

Roosevelt's administration adopted a policy of neutrality, aiming to avoid involvement in international conflicts. By refraining from openly criticizing Japanese and German aggression, Roosevelt sought to maintain a position of neutrality and prevent the United States from being dragged into potential conflicts.

Furthermore, Roosevelt's administration was also aware of the limited effectiveness of the League of Nations in addressing international conflicts and saw it as an organization that lacked sufficient enforcement mechanisms to effectively curb aggression by its member states.

Overall, Roosevelt's decision reflected a combination of domestic priorities, a desire for neutrality, and skepticism towards the League of Nations' ability to address global aggression effectively.

Learn more about Japanese and German aggression click here :brainly.com/question/2609744

#SPJ11

The talented diplomatic negotiator and leading architect of détente with the Soviet Union during the Nixon and Ford administrations was Henry Kissinger.

Kissinger's expertise in international relations and his strategic approach to diplomacy played a crucial role in shaping U.S.-Soviet relations during a critical period of the Cold War.

Henry Kissinger, a German-born American diplomat and political scientist, served as the National Security Advisor and later as the Secretary of State under Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. He played a pivotal role in implementing the policy of détente, which aimed to ease tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union through diplomatic engagement and negotiations.

Kissinger's diplomatic efforts focused on establishing channels of communication with Soviet leaders, particularly through his secret meetings with Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko and later with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev. He worked towards arms control agreements, such as the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I), and fostered cooperation in areas of mutual interest, such as space exploration and trade.

Kissinger's strategic thinking and diplomatic finesse allowed him to navigate the complexities of U.S.-Soviet relations during a period marked by ideological differences and heightened geopolitical tensions. His negotiation skills and ability to build trust played a significant role in the success of détente, which contributed to a temporary easing of Cold War hostilities and opened the door to increased diplomatic exchanges between the two superpowers.

Overall, Henry Kissinger's role as a talented diplomatic negotiator and leading architect of détente with the Soviet Union was instrumental in shaping U.S. foreign policy during the Nixon and Ford administrations. His strategic approach to diplomacy and commitment to finding common ground helped establish a more stable and cooperative relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union during a critical phase of the Cold War.

to learn more about Henry Kissinger click here; brainly.com/question/1139607

#SPJ11

Support of Iran which allowed for the US to obtain 40% of the oil fields in that country, appears to support the argument that the driving force behind every U.S. action in the Middle East is based on America getting access to the oil. Therefore, the correct option is B.

This is because the United States' support of Iran during the reign of the Shah allowed American companies to acquire a significant stake in the Iranian oil industry. This move was seen as a strategic move to secure access to oil resources in the Middle East, which is a vital component of the American economy and global energy security.

Options A and C do not necessarily support the argument as they are related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Iran-Iraq war, respectively, and do not directly relate to the acquisition of oil resources. Therefore, the answer is option B.

Note: The question is incomplete. The complete question probably is: It has been argued that the driving force behind every U.S. action in the middle east is based on America getting access to the oil. Which of the following action appears to support this action. A) Support of the partition of Israel and Palestine B) Support of Iran which allowed for the US to obtain 40% of the oil fields in that country C) Involvement in the Iran-Iraq war D) All of the above.

Learn more about Oil industry:

https://brainly.com/question/27133073

#SPJ11

One specific historical effect of the Vietnam War on United States society was the erosion of public trust in the government and a rise in anti-war sentiment and activism.

The Vietnam War had a profound impact on United States society, and one notable effect was the erosion of public trust in the government. The war was marked by controversial decisions, such as the Gulf of Tonkin incident and the Pentagon Papers revelations, which revealed government deception and misinformation. These events, coupled with the high number of casualties and the prolonged nature of the conflict, led to widespread disillusionment among the American public. As a result, anti-war sentiment grew, and protests against the war intensified. The Vietnam War played a significant role in shaping the social and political landscape of the United States, fueling a wave of activism and distrust in government institutions.

To learn more about pentagon papers click here brainly.com/question/31107611

#SPJ11

Pseudoscientific ideas of race during 1933-1946 had a devastating impact on the Jewish nation, fueling anti-Semitism and enabling the Holocaust.

During the period of 1933 to 1946, the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation was profound and devastating.

Nazi Germany propagated false notions of racial superiority and anti-Semitic theories that were based on pseudoscience.

These ideas labeled Jews as a "racial enemy" and dehumanized them.

Pseudoscientific concepts like eugenics and Social Darwinism were used to justify discrimination, persecution, and ultimately, the Holocaust.

Jews were targeted for extermination based on their perceived racial inferiority, as propagated by Nazi ideology.

These pseudoscientific ideas of race fueled widespread anti-Semitism, leading to the systemic persecution, imprisonment, and mass murder of millions of Jews.

The impact on the Jewish nation was catastrophic, with families torn apart, communities destroyed, and a significant loss of life and cultural heritage.

It is crucial to recognize the danger of pseudoscience and how it can be manipulated to justify oppression and genocide.

The period of 1933 to 1946 serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences that such false and hateful ideas can have on a targeted group of people.

For more such questions on Pseudoscientific ideas:

https://brainly.com/question/32300794

#SPJ11

The upright stones of Stonehenge were erected approximately 4,500 years ago, during the Neolithic period, around 2500 BCE.

The upright stones of Stonehenge were erected around 2500 BCE during the Neolithic period approximately 4,500 years ago. The first stage of construction involved the digging of a large circular ditch, which was then surrounded by a bank of earth. The upright stones, known as sarsens, were then brought from Marlborough Downs, approximately 20 miles away, and erected in two concentric circles within the bank and ditch.

The smaller bluestones, which were brought from Wales, were also added to the site in later stages of construction. The exact purpose of Stonehenge remains a mystery, but it is believed to have served as a ceremonial site and a place for burial rituals.

Learn more about Stonehenge:

https://brainly.com/question/598235

#SPJ11

The factors that influenced the peace treaties that ended World War I included geopolitical considerations, national interests, territorial adjustments, and the desire for lasting peace and stability.

The peace treaties, particularly the Treaty of Versailles, were heavily influenced by the major powers involved in the war, namely the Allied Powers (led by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and the Central Powers (led by Germany). These powers sought to address various issues such as territorial boundaries, reparations, disarmament, and the establishment of international organizations like the League of Nations.

Geopolitical considerations played a significant role in redrawing the map of Europe and reshaping the balance of power among nations. National interests and the desire to protect their respective territories and populations were key drivers in determining the terms of the treaties. Additionally, the devastation caused by the war and the quest for a lasting peace influenced the negotiations and the subsequent agreements.

Overall, the peace treaties were influenced by a complex interplay of factors, with the aim of resolving the conflict, preventing future wars, and establishing a new world order after the devastation of World War I.

You can learn more about World War I  at

https://brainly.com/question/446364

#SPJ11

The best course of action to ensure Tommy can be treated today and that the procedure will go smoothly is to start with a conversation.

Before any further treatment begins, it is important to understand why Tommy is having difficulty and to try and identify what the root cause is. It could be that Tommy is scared or in pain and reassuring him that he is in good hands and that they are there to help could help to reduce the anxiety.

If possible, it might help to allow Tommy to bring a toy or a family member into the examination room to help ease his nerves. Additionally, trying to distract Tommy with singing/talking to him and making the situation more pleasant could help to keep him relaxed and allow him to cooperate. If the situation continues to escalate, a short break might be beneficial to allow Tommy to calm down and for the staff to go through the treatment plan in more detail.

To know more about anxiety, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/3253078

#SPJ4

Answer: Nixon ran as a peace candidate, so it would be B

Explanation:

President Richard Nixon attempt to stop the release of the Pentagon Papers because the documents included classified information that had been leaked. The correct option is a.

The Pentagon Papers contained classified information about the US involvement in the Vietnam War that had been leaked to the public prompting President Richard Nixon to try and halt their release. Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson's administrations, among others, had their decisions called into question as a result of the papers disclosure of government secrets.

The disclosure of this information according to Nixon would jeopardize national security and harm the government's standing and its handling of the war. He tried to use the law to stop their publication but in the end the Supreme Court upheld the press's right to do so pointing to the significance of the First Amendment's protection of free speech and the press.

learn more about Pentagon Papers here

brainly.com/question/34189395

#SPJ2

Answer:

he role of former slaves in ending the transatlantic Slave Trade was significant and cannot be understated. While the efforts of various groups and individuals were instrumental in bringing about the abolition of the Slave Trade, the voices and actions of former slaves played a crucial role in raising awareness, shaping public opinion, and advocating for the abolitionist cause. Here are some key aspects highlighting their significance:

First-hand Testimony: Former slaves who had experienced the horrors and brutality of slavery firsthand provided compelling testimonies that exposed the inhumane nature of the Slave Trade. Their narratives, published in newspapers, books, and pamphlets, offered vivid accounts of the atrocities inflicted upon enslaved individuals, which helped sway public opinion against slavery and the Slave Trade.

Activism and Advocacy: Former slaves actively participated in abolitionist movements, both individually and collectively. They formed organizations, such as the Anti-Slavery Society of Canada or the African Aid Society, and became influential abolitionist speakers, writers, and activists. Their speeches, writings, and public engagements helped galvanize support for the abolitionist cause and pressured governments to take action.

Underground Railroad: Former slaves played a pivotal role in the operation of the Underground Railroad, a network of secret routes and safe houses that facilitated the escape of enslaved individuals to free states and Canada. They risked their lives to guide and assist fellow slaves on their journey to freedom, contributing to the growing resistance against slavery and the Slave Trade.

International Impact: Former slaves who escaped or were freed became powerful advocates on the international stage. They traveled to Europe and other parts of the world, sharing their stories and experiences, and contributing to the growing global condemnation of the Slave Trade. Their efforts helped mobilize international pressure on nations engaged in the Slave Trade and ultimately led to its abolition.

Symbolic Importance: The mere existence of former slaves who had successfully escaped or gained their freedom served as a powerful symbol of resistance and hope. Their personal stories of liberation and resilience inspired others to take action, fostering a growing sentiment against slavery and the Slave Trade.

Explanation:

The region of the Global South that has countries characterized by features of neocolonialism is C) Latin America.

Neocolonialism refers to the continuation of economic, political, and cultural dominance by former colonial powers or other external forces in post-colonial countries. In Latin America, historical patterns of colonization and economic exploitation have left a lasting impact on the region.

Many Latin American countries have experienced foreign interventions, economic dependency, and unequal power dynamics with external actors. This includes factors such as multinational corporations exploiting natural resources, unequal trade relations, and the influence of foreign policies that prioritize the interests of dominant nations.

Additionally, Latin America has witnessed interventions and regime changes supported by external powers, which have often served their own geopolitical and economic interests.

To learn more about Latin America, visit

brainly.com/question/30608091

#SPJ11

Anglo-Persian Oil Company was the first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia.

The first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia (also known as the Middle East) were the Western oil companies, particularly the British and the Americans. The discovery of oil in the region began in the early 1900s, with the first major oil discovery being made in Iran (then known as Persia) in 1908. This led to the establishment of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (later renamed as BP), which began extracting and exporting oil from the region.

Other Western oil companies, such as Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Texaco, followed suit, establishing their own operations in the region. They made huge profits from the oil reserves, which were abundant and relatively easy to extract.

The exploitation of oil reserves in Southwest Asia had a major impact on the region's economy and politics. It led to the rise of powerful oil-producing states such as Saudi Arabia, which used their oil wealth to modernize their countries and influence global politics. However, it also had negative consequences, such as the environmental damage caused by oil extraction and the exploitation of local workers.

In conclusion, the first to exploit the oil reserves in Southwest Asia were the Western oil companies, particularly the British and the Americans, who established operations in the region in the early 1900s. Their exploitation of the region's oil reserves had far-reaching impacts on the economy and politics of the region and the world at large.

Learn more about Anglo-Persian Oil Company:

https://brainly.com/question/3702288

#SPJ11

The west german minister of the economy fostered economic growth by promoting free market principles and encouraging private enterprise, he helped to create an environment that supported business growth and job creation, and laid the foundation for the country's continued economic success in the decades to come

In 1957, the West German Minister of the Economy, Ludwig Erhard, implemented a series of economic policies that are credited with fostering significant economic growth in the country. Erhard's policies were based on the principles of free market economics, and were designed to reduce government intervention in the economy and promote private enterprise. One of the key policies that Erhard implemented was the abolition of price controls, which had been in place since the end of World War II. This move allowed prices to be set by the market, which helped to stimulate competition and encourage businesses to innovate and improve efficiency. Erhard also introduced tax reforms that incentivized investment and entrepreneurship, such as a reduction in the corporate tax rate and the elimination of certain taxes on capital gains. These policies helped to attract investment to Germany and encouraged businesses to expand and create jobs. Finally, Erhard focused on improving the country's infrastructure, investing in transportation networks and modernizing industry. This helped to make Germany a more attractive location for businesses and supported economic growth across a range of industries. Overall, Ludwig Erhard's policies were instrumental in fostering economic growth in West Germany in the late 1950s and early 1960s.

For more such questions on economy

https://brainly.com/question/30197415

#SPJ11

The correct answer is In 1957, the West German Minister of the Economy, Ludwig Erhard, introduced a new economic policy called the "Social Market Economy."

This policy was aimed at promoting economic growth and reducing government intervention in the market. The policy included measures such as reducing taxes, cutting regulations, and increasing competition. It also included a commitment to social welfare programs, such as public health insurance and pension plans. The Social Market Economy is credited with helping to transform West Germany into one of the world's leading economies in the post-war period.

To learn more about economic click the link below:

brainly.com/question/15555711

#SPJ11

Since the 1950s, the economies of Latin America have experienced various challenges and changes. They have faced periods of economic growth and decline, with notable factors including political instability.

The economies of Latin America have had a mixed record since the 1950s. During certain periods, the region witnessed notable economic growth and progress, driven by factors such as industrialization, urbanization, and favorable global conditions. However, political instability has frequently hindered sustained economic development, with frequent changes in government, coup d'états, and social unrest impacting policy continuity and investor confidence.

Additionally, Latin American countries have faced recurring challenges related to external debt. Several debt crises have occurred, resulting in significant economic downturns and the implementation of austerity measures to manage debt burdens. Moreover, the region's heavy reliance on commodity exports, such as oil, minerals, and agricultural products, has exposed it to price volatility and fluctuations in global demand, affecting its economic performance.

Structural issues, including income inequality, limited access to education and healthcare, and informal labor markets, have also impeded inclusive and sustainable growth in Latin America. These factors have contributed to a complex economic landscape characterized by uneven development, persistent poverty, and disparities in wealth distribution across the region.



To learn more about urbanization click here

brainly.com/question/12881754

#SPJ11

Indentured servitude was opposed by the ruling elite who condemned forced labor as incompatible with the values of the colonial leaders. The statement is False.

The statement is false. Indentured servitude, which involved individuals agreeing to work for a specific period in exchange for passage to the colonies or other benefits, was not universally opposed by the ruling elite in the American colonies. In fact, indentured servitude was widely practiced and accepted, particularly in the Southern colonies.

Indentured servitude was an integral part of the labor system in the early colonial period. The ruling elite, including colonial leaders and plantation owners, relied heavily on indentured servants for agricultural labor and other forms of work. The system allowed them to acquire labor at a relatively low cost and helped meet the growing demand for labor in the expanding colonies.

It is important to note that while indentured servitude was not universally condemned by the ruling elite, it did face criticism and opposition in certain contexts. Over time, concerns about abuses and exploitation within the system led to the rise of anti-indenture sentiments and the eventual transition to other forms of labor, such as African slavery, which further divided the colonies in terms of labor practices.

Learn more about colonial leaders here:

https://brainly.com/question/29466808

#SPJ11

World War 1 contributed to Europe's economic weakness leading to the Great Depression through heavy war debts, destruction of infrastructure, disrupted trade, and political bility.

These factors strained economies, causing financial crises and hampering recovery efforts, eventually contributing to the global economic downturn.

World War 1 had significant economic repercussions for Europe, which eventually played a role in the onset of the Great Depression. Here is a more detailed explanation:

1. Heavy war debts: European countries accumulated massive debts to finance the war. Germany, in particular, faced enormous reparation payments under the Treaty of Versailles. These financial burdens strained economies and made it challenging to invest in post-war reconstruction.

2. Destruction of infrastructure: The war caused extensive destruction of physical infrastructure, including factories, transportation networks, and housing. The need for reconstruction placed further economic pressure on countries, diverting resources away from productive investment .

3. Disrupted trade: The conflict disrupted international trade patterns. Maritime routes were affected, and trade partners faced economic difficulties. The imposition of trade barriers and protectionist policies further hindered economic recovery, limiting market access and hampering growth.

4. Political bility: The aftermath of World War 1 brought political turmoil to many European nations. Governments faced challenges in maintaining stability, and political unrest affected policymaking and economic planning. These uncertainties added to the economic fragility of the region.

5. Financial crises: The war-induced economic weaknesses, coupled with the global shift from wartime to peacetime production, triggered financial crises in several European countries. Inflation, currency bility, and banking failures were prevalent, further damaging the already vulnerable economies.

6. Global impact: The economic weaknesses in Europe spread to the global stage, amplifying the effects of the Great Depression. The interconnectedness of economies through trade and financial systems meant that the economic downturn in Europe had far-reaching consequences worldwide.

In summary, the economic repercussions of World War 1, including war debts, infrastructure destruction, disrupted trade, and political bility, created an environment of economic weakness in Europe. These factors, combined with the global economic challenges of the time, contributed to the onset of the Great Depression.

Learn more about investment here:

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ11

Globalization affects all of the above: global economics, global politics, and global supply chains.

For more questions on Globalization

https://brainly.com/question/25499191

#SPJ8

The Garden of Eden myth is likely partially responsible for Western culture's disdain toward reptiles. According to the biblical story, in the Garden of Eden, a serpent tempts Eve to eat the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge.

This act is seen as the origin of humanity's fall from grace and the introduction of sin into the world. The serpent, traditionally depicted as a reptile, is associated with deception, evil, and temptation in this narrative.

The negative portrayal of the serpent in the Garden of Eden has influenced Western cultural attitudes toward reptiles. It has contributed to a perception of reptiles as symbols of deceit, danger, and untrustworthiness.

This association has been ingrained in various cultural and religious traditions, shaping attitudes and beliefs about reptiles that persist to some extent in Western societies.

It is important to note that while this myth has influenced cultural perceptions, individual attitudes toward reptiles can vary widely. Additionally, scientific understanding and appreciation of reptiles have evolved over time, leading to a more nuanced and informed perspective.

To know more about the Garden of Eden:

https://brainly.com/question/30705391

#SPJ1

The event that prompted Spain to negotiate the sale of Florida to the United States was the Seminole War. The correct option is d. the Seminole War.

The conflict arose due to tensions between the U.S. settlers and the Seminole tribe, who lived in Florida. The Seminoles provided a safe haven for runaway slaves and often conducted raids into U.S. territory, leading to disputes and violence.

During this time, Spain was facing its own internal issues, including a civil war. Spain's weakened position and inability to maintain control over the region made it difficult for them to effectively manage the situation in Florida. Moreover, the U.S. had a stronger military presence in the area, making it challenging for Spain to protect its interests.

Considering these factors, Spain decided to negotiate the sale of Florida to the United States to resolve the ongoing conflict and secure their own interests. The Adams-Onis Treaty, signed in 1819, formalized the transfer of Florida to the U.S., and in return, the U.S. government agreed to pay $5 million to settle American citizens' claims against Spain. The correct option is d. the Seminole War.

For more about Seminole War

https://brainly.com/question/4125434

#SPJ11

The central Asian rebels who fought against the Bolsheviks were known as the Basmachi movement.

The Basmachi movement was an anti-Soviet resistance movement that emerged in the early 20th century in Central Asia, particularly in regions such as present-day Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan. The Basmachi fighters, consisting of various ethnic groups and tribes, opposed the Bolshevik rule and sought to maintain independence or autonomy in the region.

The term "Basmachi" itself means "bandit" or "rebel" in the local languages. The movement was characterized by guerrilla warfare tactics and sporadic armed resistance against Soviet forces. The Basmachi fighters aimed to protect their land, culture, and traditional way of life from the perceived threats and impositions of the Bolshevik regime.

Learn more about movement here:

https://brainly.com/question/30694776

#SPJ11

The Monroe Doctrine is a United States foreign policy position that opposes European colonialism in the Western Hemisphere. It holds that any intervention in the political affairs of the Americas by foreign powers is a potentially hostile act against the United States.

Answer:

The Monroe Doctrine was the declaration by President James Monroe , in December 1823, that the United States would not tolerate a European nation colonizing an independent nation in North or South America. The United States warned it would consider any such intervention in the Western Hemisphere to be a hostile act.

The term that identifies the differences in the goals and interests of different parts of the country is sectionalism.

Sectionalism refers to the loyalty and concerns of individuals or groups towards a particular region or section of a country, rather than the nation as a whole. It arises when different regions have distinct economic, social, cultural, or political interests that may conflict with each other. Sectionalism often occurs in diverse countries with varying geographical, economic, and social characteristics.

In the context of the United States, sectionalism was particularly evident in the 19th century, leading up to the Civil War. The North and the South had different economic systems and relied on different forms of labor (industrialization and slavery, respectively). These differences in economic interests, coupled with disagreements over issues like tariffs, internal improvements, and the expansion of slavery into new territories, exacerbated sectional tensions and eventually contributed to the outbreak of the Civil War.

Sectionalism can hinder national unity and cooperation, as it prioritizes regional interests over the overall well-being of the entire country. It often leads to political divisions, conflicts, and challenges in finding common ground for effective governance.

Learn more about Sectionalism

#SPJ11

Tsar Nicholas II abdicated his throne as a result of a series of strikes that broke out in Russia during the early 20th century.

The strikes were organized by workers who were demanding better wages, working conditions, and more political rights. The strikes quickly spread throughout the country, and soon became a major threat to the Tsarist government. Tsar Nicholas II attempted to suppress the strikes by using force, but this only made things worse.

The strikes eventually became so widespread that they paralyzed the country's economy and made it impossible for the Tsar to maintain control. In the end, the Tsar was forced to abdicate his throne, and this led to the eventual collapse of the Russian monarchy.

Learn more about Tsar Nicholas II:

https://brainly.com/question/30375304

#SPJ11

False. The new Republic of Turkey was not created by Turkish forces, but rather by the Turkish National Movement under the leadership of General Mustafa Kemal. In 1923, the movement successfully overthrew the Ottoman Empire and established the Republic of Turkey.

Mustafa Kemal, later known as Atatürk, played a crucial role in leading the Turkish War of Independence against foreign occupying forces. He implemented sweeping political, social, and cultural reforms that transformed Turkey into a secular, modern nation-state. Under Atatürk's guidance, the republic embraced Western principles and separated religion from the state, aiming to create a more progressive and democratic society. The Turkish forces, therefore, served as a means to achieve the establishment of the Republic, rather than being the creators themselves.

To clarify, it was the Turkish National Movement, led by General Mustafa Kemal, that created the new Republic of Turkey in 1923. This movement consisted of various elements, including military forces, but it wasn't solely composed of Turkish forces. The movement aimed to protect the territorial integrity of Turkey and ensure its independence, particularly during the aftermath of World War I and the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. Mustafa Kemal's leadership was instrumental in achieving these goals and laying the foundation for the modern Turkish state. His visionary approach to governance and his efforts to modernize Turkey continue to shape the country's identity to this day.

to learn more about Republic of Turkey click here; brainly.com/question/32035381

#SPJ11

At the start of World War II, the nation's wire services consisted of two major entities: the United Press (UP) and the Associated Press (AP).

The United Press (UP) and the Associated Press (AP) were the two dominant wire services in the United States during the early years of World War II. Wire services played a crucial role in disseminating news and information across the country and around the world.

The United Press, established in 1907, was a cooperative news agency that provided news coverage to newspapers and other media outlets. It employed reporters and correspondents stationed in various locations to gather and report news stories. The United Press served as a primary source of news for many newspapers and played a significant role in providing coverage of the war.

The Associated Press, founded in 1846, is one of the oldest news agencies in the United States. It operates as a not-for-profit cooperative, with member newspapers and broadcast outlets contributing to its news gathering and distribution. The Associated Press also maintained a network of reporters and correspondents worldwide, allowing it to provide comprehensive news coverage, including updates on the war. During World War II, both the United Press and the Associated Press played critical roles in reporting news from the frontlines, providing updates on battles, casualties, and other significant events. Their reports were transmitted via telegraph and radio, reaching newspapers and audiences across the country.

The United Press and the Associated Press were instrumental in keeping the American public informed about the progress of the war and the events unfolding on the global stage. Their contributions helped shape public opinion, provided essential information for decision-makers, and facilitated a greater understanding of the war's impact on society.

To learn more about World War II click here: brainly.com/question/1261207

#SPJ11

Emperor Alexius I closed the gates of Constantinople to the vast majority of European crusaders due to concerns about maintaining control over his capital, avoiding potential conflict with the Crusaders, and protecting the Byzantine Empire from a possible military threat.

Emperor Alexius I of the Byzantine Empire, during the First Crusade in the late 11th century, made the decision to close the gates of Constantinople to most of the European crusaders. There were several reasons behind this choice. Firstly, Alexius wanted to maintain control over his capital and prevent a large influx of foreign troops that could disrupt the stability of the city. By allowing only a limited number of Crusaders into Constantinople, he could exercise greater control over the situation.

Secondly, there were concerns about potential conflicts arising from the arrival of different Crusader groups with diverse motivations and objectives. The Byzantine Empire had its own strategic goals, and Alexius wanted to minimize the potential clashes and maintain diplomatic control over the Crusader movement.

Lastly, closing the gates served as a defensive measure to protect the Byzantine Empire from the possibility of a military threat. The Crusaders were a formidable force, and Alexius wanted to avoid a scenario where the city could be overwhelmed by a large number of Crusader armies. By allowing a select group of Crusaders while keeping the majority outside the city walls, Alexius could better manage any potential military threat and safeguard the interests of his empire.

To learn more about constantinople click here brainly.com/question/14235394

#SPJ11

Option B) increasing population is Correct. The period from 1820 to 1860 in the United States was characterized by significant economic growth, which was driven by a variety of factors.

Some of the key factors that contributed to this growth include:

Agricultural innovations, such as the invention of the cotton gin, which increased the productivity of crops like cotton and helped to spur the growth of the textile industry.

The expansion of railroads and other forms of transportation, which made it easier to move goods and people around the country.

The growth of manufacturing, as new technologies and new markets for goods emerged.

The development of new resources, such as oil and natural gas, which helped to fuel economic growth in the latter part of the period.

However, the factor that is not listed as contributing to American economic growth during this period is the maintenance of low tariff rates. While tariffs did play a role in American economic growth in the 19th century, they were not a significant factor during the period from 1820 to 1860.

Learn more about economic Visit: brainly.com/question/30631117

#SPJ4

Correct Question:

All of the following factors contributed to American economic growth from 1820 to 1860 EXCEPT the:

A) maintenance of low tariff rates.

B) increasing population.

C) abundance of natural resources.

D) improved transportation

E) influx of European capital.

As of the studies cutoff in September 2021, El Salvador is not considered a communist country. It is a democratic republic with a multi-party system and a market-based economy.

Since the end of the Salvadoran Civil War in 1992, El Salvador has undergone significant political and economic transformations. The country transitioned from a period of armed conflict and authoritarian rule to a democratic system characterized by regular elections, political pluralism, and respect for human rights.

El Salvador's economic system is based on free-market principles, with private ownership of businesses and the pursuit of profit. The government has implemented economic policies aimed at attracting foreign investment, promoting trade, and fostering economic growth. It has also pursued social programs to address issues of poverty, inequality, and social development.

While there have been political parties in El Salvador with different ideological orientations, including left-wing parties, the country's political landscape is not dominated by a communist party or ideology. Instead, there is a range of political parties representing diverse perspectives and competing in democratic elections.

It's important to note that political situations can evolve, and it's advisable to seek more recent and up-to-date information to accurately assess the current political landscape in El Salvador.

For more questions on El Salvador

https://brainly.com/question/1937251

#SPJ11

Answer: B- specialization exchange

Explanation:

if they are trading specialized objects then they are doing an exchange but not for any regular objects but specialized objects.