What form of government did Thomas Paine reject
Answer: monarchical and mixed forms of government
Without the rivers the whole area would be a
Answer:
desert
Explanation:
Without rivers the whole area would be a desert.
Why did President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s Lend-Lease program with the Allies have strong opposition from isolationists?
A. It shifted foreign policy away from neutrality.
B. In assured the President another term in office.
C. It shifted attention away from the bad economy.
D. It ignored the Supreme Court’s most recent ruling
The Lend-Lease program initiated by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt with the Allies had strong opposition from isolationists because America's act of providing aid to allies was a form of partisanship that undermined the US' neutral status during World War II. Therefore the correct answer is:
A. It shifted foreign policy away from neutrality.
During World War II, the American government under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt passed the Lend-Lease Act. This 1941 law stated that the US government could lend or lease (rather than sell) weaponry to any country deemed "essential to the defense of the United States." Thus, the United States was able to provide military assistance to its foreign allies during World War II, while remaining formally neutral in the conflict.
More about Lend-Lease program on:
https://brainly.com/question/1644904
#SPJ4
Tennesseans went out of their way to help in any way they could in the revolution against British, ___, and Native American forces who were trying to subdue the colonists.
Tennesseans went out of their way to help in any way they could in the revolution against British, Cherokees and Native American forces who were trying to subdue the colonists.
What were Tennesseans impact during revolutionary war?Since the 1780 Battle of King's Mountain, when hundreds of Tennessee militiamen helped turn the tide of the Revolutionary War in the South, Tennessee has been known as the Volunteer State.
The only battle fought within the current boundaries of Tennessee was at Boyd's Creek, against the Cherokees, who were British allies at the time.Although the Treaty of Paris was signed with Great Britain in 1783, the Indian Wars raged in Tennessee and other American frontiers for another twelve years, until the Treaty of Greenville, a peace treaty with British-allied Indians, was signed in 1795.
Read more about Tennesseans
brainly.com/question/3945797
#SPJ1
What do the graphics titled “The End of Weimar” and “The Brown Flood” show about the popularity of the Nazi party in the early 1930’s?
PLEASE HELP IM SHORT IN TIME!
What two conclusions might a ruler of an empire draw from the decline of the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires?
The government should allow officials to use tax money as they see fit.
A strong, loyal army is necessary to protect the empire from invaders.
Government officials should be chosen only by military officials.
The government should try to prevent internal rebellions.
The people should be isolated from other cultures to keep the empire strong.
The two conclusions might a ruler of an empire are the government should allow officials to use tax money as they see fit & the government should try to prevent internal rebellions. The correct option is (A & D).
What do you mean by the Han empire?The Han dynasty, which ruled from 206 BCE to 220 CE, is renowned for its lengthy rule and numerous accomplishments, including the creation of the civil service and governmental framework as well as scientific advances like the invention of paper, the use of water clocks and sundials to keep track of time, and the creation of a seismograph.
According to the Records of the Grand Historian, Liu Bang was named prince of the minor fief of Han Zhong, which bears its name from its location on the Han River, by the hegemon Xiang Yu following the fall of the Qin dynasty.
Therefore, the two conclusions might a ruler of an empire draw from the decline of the Han, Roman, and Gupta empires were:
The government should allow officials to use tax money as they see fit.The government should try to prevent internal rebellions.To know more about the Han empire, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/7550252
#SPJ1
What do you think about suppressing certain evidence because it has been obtained illegally? How does it relate to the Constitutional right to due process? Explain your point of view fully, giving examples to back yourself up.
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using the bulk of the evidence gathered in violation of the US Constitution.
Can evidence that was obtained unlawfully be used?Evidence must be legally gathered in order to be admitted in a criminal case. In most cases, evidence that was obtained unlawfully cannot be used against you in court. While there are few exceptions, any evidence that was gathered in violation of your constitutional rights can be contested by a competent defense lawyer.
How might evidence be illegally obtained?Another illustration of unlawfully obtained evidence would be if someone was in someone else's residence when the police entered, carried out an illegal search, and discovered something unlawful on the visitor.
To know more about evidence visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27371542
#SPJ1
A country that is multiethnic has many types of government within its borders. a population with a high life expectancy. several major groups of people with different cultures. one official language, with several different dialects.
A country that is multiethnic has several major groups of people with different cultures. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.
What is a multiethnic nation?A multinational union or state is a sovereign body made up of two or more countries or states. In contrast, in a nation-state, the majority of the population comes from only one nation. There are hundreds of minor ethnic and tribal groups living in the complex, multiethnic nation of India. That intricacy resulted from a protracted and intricate history of marriages and migration. No ethnic group has a majority in the multiethnic nation of Montenegro.
Learn more about multiethnic culture, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29910442
#SPJ1
What are the causes and effects of the Harlem Renaissance. Please write alot thanks!
Answer:
The Harlem Renaissance was a cultural movement that occurred in the 1920s and 1930s. It was centered in Harlem, a neighborhood in New York City with a large African American population. The Harlem Renaissance was caused by a variety of factors, including the Great Migration, which saw millions of African Americans leave the rural South and move to urban areas in the North and West. This movement led to a concentration of African Americans in Harlem, which in turn created a critical mass of artists and intellectuals who were able to nurture and support each other's creative endeavors.
The Harlem Renaissance had a number of significant effects. One of the most important was the way it helped to promote African American culture and pride. During this time, African Americans were able to celebrate their heritage and express their unique cultural identity through art, literature, music, and other forms of creative expression. This had a profound impact on the African American community and helped to pave the way for the civil rights movement that would follow in the decades to come. The Harlem Renaissance also had a broader impact on American culture, influencing everything from literature and art to music and fashion.
The _________ was successful, and for almost twelve years the Pueblos Indians lived autonomously from Europeans.
The Pueblo Revolt was successful, and for almost twelve years the Pueblos Indians lived autonomously from Europeans.
The original people attempted to incorporate Christian customs into their own practises while the Europeans attempted to turn the Pueblo to Catholicism. The Spanish, who intended on complete conversion, particularly of the young, who they stole away from their homes and tribes, found this to be unacceptable.
Native Americans tried to maintain their independence through open insurrection, such as the Pueblo Revolt of 1680, when adaptation failed. Success in this uprising allowed the life of the Pueblos to return to normal for over twelve years. However, the Pueblos' independence was short-lived as the Spanish quickly regained control of the area by taking advantage of the opponents' constant attacks.
Know more about Pueblo Revolt here
https://brainly.com/question/28472507
#SPJ4
What was the main purpose of the Lend-Lease Act of 1941 ?
The US could now lend or lease war supplies to any nation that was deemed "vital to the defense of the US," thanks to legislation that was passed on March 11, 1941.
What was the Lend-Lease Act?Through the lend-lease program, any country whose defense was crucial to American national security may receive military assistance.
Roosevelt was granted the go-ahead to lend Britain weapons on the understanding that America would get paid in kind after the battle.
Most importantly, the passage of the Lend-Lease Act enabled a beleaguered Great Britain to battle Germany effectively by itself until the United States entered the war in the latter half of 1941.
Thanks to legislation that was approved on March 11, 1941, the US may now lend or lease war supplies to any country that was considered to be "essential to the defense of the US."
Therefore, the US could now lend or lease war supplies to any nation that was deemed "vital to the defense of the US," thanks to legislation that was passed on March 11, 1941.
Know more about the Lend-Lease Act here:
brainly.com/question/1126649
#SPJ4
what is the struggle of Nigerian literature.
Nigerian literature manifests the struggles of a people whose country is undergoing the painful process of transformation from colonial through neo-colonial to wholly self-determining nation.
he Sioux and Sitting Bull led the attack on General George Armstrong Custer's cavalry at the Battle of Little Big Horn. Why did the Sioux take this course of action
Sitting Bull and the Sioux led the attack on Custer's cavalry at the Battle of Little Big Horn because the U.S. Government had broken its promise to allow the Sioux to remain in the Black Hills and was seeking to push them out of those regions.
On June 25, 1876, at the Little Bighorn River in Montana Territory, Lakota Sioux and Cheyenne warriors fought alongside federal soldiers led by Lieutenant Colonel George Armstrong Custer (1839–76).
Two Great Plains Sioux leaders, Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse, who lived from around 1840 to 77, fiercely resisted the American government's attempts to relocate their people to Indian reservations in the middle of the 19th century.
The U.S. Army disregarded past treaty promises and invaded the area in 1875 after gold was found in South Dakota's Black Hills. Many members of the Sioux and Cheyenne tribes were forced to abandon their reservations as a result of this betrayal and join Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse in Montana. In defiance of a U.S. War Department order to return to their reservations or risk being assaulted, some 10,000 Native Americans had congregated towards the end of the spring of 1876 in a camp they dubbed the Greasy Grass near the Little Bighorn River.
To know more about Battle of Little Big Horn
brainly.com/question/11195494
#SPJ4
ANSWER FOR BRAINLIST AND 20 POINTS
5. What idea was part of George Washington's Farewell Address?
The dangers of political parties and factions was an idea that was part of George Washington's Farewell Address.
What was George Washington's farewell address?
One key idea in George Washington's Farewell Address was the importance of unity and national cohesion, and the dangers of political parties and factionalism. He warned against the destructive effects of "cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men" who would try to use divisions within the country for their own gain. He also emphasized the importance of civic virtue and morality in maintaining a strong republic.
George Washington's Farewell Address was a statement written by him in 1796 as his presidency came to a close. He chose not to seek a third term and instead decided to retire from public life. In his Farewell Address, he addressed the American people and offered his thoughts on the nation's future.
He discussed the importance of unity and national cohesion, the dangers of political parties and factionalism, the importance of civic virtue and morality, and the role of the country in international affairs.
Read more on George Washington here: https://brainly.com/question/815647
#SPJ1
What were the two major reasons for the passage of the 14th Amendment?
The Amendment was passed to bring unity amongst the hugely divided Americans at that time. Slaves were being freed during this period. The former slaves were free but some states especially in the South placed cruel restrictions against the free folk. This was becoming a problem because there was clear tension in the air. The Congress decided to counter this with the 14th Amendment which insisted on equal rights for any American citizen, no matter the race.
The other reason was pushed forward by a slave known as Dred Scott. He tried to file for citizenship along with his wife and daughter. The supreme court sadly refused his proposal. Although he was unsuccessful, he sparked a conversation that would have even the white citizens demand equal rights for the African Americans. To quel this fire, the 14th Amendment was passed making it legal for African Americans to become legal citizens.
Consider reading more about the 14th Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766420
#SPJ4
The integration of public schools in Little Rock did not completely end opposition to desegregation. ended opposition to desegregation. proved that desegregation of schools was not feasible.
On September 3, 1957, when Governor Orval Faubus activated the Arkansas National Guard in an effort to stop nine African American students from integrating the high school, the desegregation of Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas, attracted widespread notice.
Nine African American pupils who attended Little Rock Central High School in 1957 became known as "The Little Rock Nine." Following their admission came the Little Rock Crisis, in which the pupils were first denied entry to the racially segregated school by the governor of Arkansas, Orval Faubus.
Courts and the federal government placed pressure on local districts to integrate, school segregation significantly decreased. However, same initiatives also gave rise to vehement, occasionally racist, pushback that influenced political discourse for years.
To learn more about integrating the school, refer
https://brainly.com/question/12088905
#SPJ4
What were 4 effects of the Russian Revolution?
The effect of the Russian Revolution is that (A) Russia was evolving into a communist nation. (B) Farmers had access to a variety of farmlands. (C) Workers were allowed access to the factory. (D) The nationalization of the banks led to the establishment of an economic management council.
What was the Russian Revolution?The Russian Revolution, a time of political and social upheaval in the former Russian Empire, began with the start of the First World War.
Russia dissolved its monarchy and switched to a socialist system of government after two further revolutions and a horrible civil war during this period.
One could argue that the Russian Revolution served as the inspiration for other European revolutions that occurred during or after World War I, such as the German Revolution of 1918.
Short-Term Effects:
(A) Russia becoming a communist nation.
(B) Farmers were given access to various farmlands.
(C) Workers received factories.
(D) Since banks were nationalized, a national council was in charge of managing the economy.
Therefore, the effect of the Russian Revolution is that (A) Russia was evolving into a communist nation. (B) Farmers had access to a variety of farmlands. (C) Workers were allowed access to the factory. (D) The nationalization of the banks led to the establishment of an economic management council.
Know more about the Russian Revolution here:
brainly.com/question/810738
#SPJ4
What was left out of the Declaration of Independence in order?
The section of Jefferson's remarks where he discussed slavery was the most significant portion to be omitted from the final text.
When Thomas Jefferson incorporated a language denouncing slavery in his draft of the Declaration of Independence, the delegates gathered in Philadelphia in the early spring and early summer of 1776 engaged in the fiercest debate. The most significant section of Jefferson's words that was omitted from the final draft deal with slavery. Jefferson blamed the repeal of the law on delegates from South Carolina, Georgia, and the North, who represented businesspeople who were actively involved in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade at the time.
To know more about Declaration of Independence
brainly.com/question/1685775
#SPJ4
What would happen if the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights?
Answer: Essay on "What would happen if the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights?"
Gave it my best shot, hope this helps :)
The concept of balancing rights is a fundamental aspect of any functioning society. It is the idea that the rights of individuals must be weighed against the rights of the community as a whole in order to ensure a just and fair society. If the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights, it would have a profound and negative impact on society as a whole.
One of the most immediate consequences of prioritizing individual rights over community rights would be an increase in social and economic inequality. If individuals were allowed to pursue their own interests without regard for the well-being of the community, those who are more powerful and affluent would have an unfair advantage over those who are not. This would lead to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, while the majority would be left to struggle in poverty and marginalization.
Additionally, the lack of community rights would lead to a breakdown in the social contract that holds society together. The social contract is the idea that individuals give up some of their rights in exchange for the protection and benefits provided by society. If the rights of the community were not first in the balance of rights, individuals would have no incentive to contribute to the common good, and society would become fragmented and uncoordinated.
Another major consequence of prioritizing individual rights over community rights would be the erosion of individual rights themselves. In a society where the rights of the community are not respected, individuals would have little protection against the abuse of power by those in positions of authority. This would lead to a loss of freedom, democracy, and human rights.
Furthermore, when the rights of the community are not given priority, it leads to a lack of trust between individuals, making it hard for them to collaborate and work together. People would have difficulty in expressing their opinions freely and openly, stifle innovation and creativity, and resulting in a stagnant society.
In conclusion, it is essential that the rights of the community are given priority in the balance of rights. This is the only way to ensure a just and fair society that is able to meet the needs and aspirations of all its members. Without the protection and promotion of community rights, society would be plagued by inequality, social fragmentation, and the erosion of individual rights.
What was rationed during World War II?
Despite the fact that thousands of things became scarce during the war, only those that were absolutely necessary for the endeavour were rationed.
Rationing laws applied to essential items like sugar, tires, fuel, meat, coffee, butter, canned foods, and shoes.
Oil, butter, sugar, and canned milk were among the items that had to be rationed because they needed to be used for the war effort. Trade was hampered by war, which reduced the supply of several items.
In times of scarcity, rationing was a way to make sure that food and other necessities were distributed fairly. After the commencement of World War II, it started with gasoline and then expanded to encompass other products including butter, sugar, and bacon. With the exception of fruit and vegetables, the rationing system eventually included the majority of goods.
To know more about World War II, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ4
You have read a speech written by Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Do you agree with Elizabeth Cady Stanton's new approach to raising girls? Compose an opinion essay stating your position. Make sure to write an introduction, include three reasons to support your opinion, use text evidence that agree with your claim, and provide a conclusion.
I need help. Im not so good with history!!
Her unrelenting commitment to women's suffrage led to the Constitution's 19th amendment, which gave women the right to vote the views of Elizabeth Cady Stanton
In her speech "The Solitude of Self," Elizabeth Cady Stanton discussed her viewpoints on independence, a topic that was crucial to the feminist movement. Throughout the entire lecture, Cady Stanton makes the case that because we are social beings, we must rely only on one another in order to survive.One of the early figures in the women's rights movement, Elizabeth Cady Stanton was an abolitionist, human rights advocate, and campaigner. Despite coming from a wealthy family, she made the decision early in life to fight for women's equal rights.
To know more about Elizabeth Cady Stanton here
https://brainly.com/question/24781064
#SPJ4
During which phae of Recontruction did the Southern tate come under martial law?
Wartime Recontruction
Preidential Recontruction
Congreional Recontruction
All phae of Recontruction involved martial law. Unlimited Attempt Remain
Option C is correct. Congress imposed martial law throughout the regions, sending troops to maintain order and defend former slaves, during Congressional reconstruction phase.
What is the state of martial law?In the United States, the term martial law refers to periods of time when a military authority was given jurisdiction over a particular area, state, city, or even the entire country. Since they both have the authority to command the militia, the US President and US Congress both have the authority to enact martial law on a national level, subject to certain restrictions. Martial law may be enacted within a state's boundaries by the governor in each state. Martial rule has very sometimes been used in the United States, including during the Battle of New Orleans in New Orleans and following significant catastrophes like the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the Great Chicago Fire, and during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot of 1963.
To know more about Martial law visit: brainly.com/question/11937991
#SPJ4
And they proceeded with the nra. Everything from a peanut stand to a power house had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. If a peanut stand started to patch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. One slip and he went to jail. A little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule book. So they wrote their nra rule book, codes, laws, etc. They got up over 900 of them. One would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. It would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail. In 3–5 sentences, analyze huey long’s criticism of the new deal. Cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis
The New Deal, in Huey Long's opinion, was as perplexing as star studies in its complexity. He claimed that the new laws created as a result were deceiving the populace and making their lives miserable.
What was The New Deal?Between 1933 and 1939, President Franklin D. Roosevelt implemented a number of initiatives, including public works projects, financial reforms, and regulations under the umbrella of the "New Deal."
It responded to the Great Depression's requirements for relief, reform, and recovery.
However, not everyone supported it, and Huey Long was among those who did. He claimed that the New Deal and the laws enacted as a result were as perplexing as a star study.
Due to the legislation created as a result, a small-time tailor who charged 5 cents less than the amount specified in the rule book ended up in jail.
Huey Long believed that the New Deal was as intricate and confusing as star studies.
The new rules that were enacted as a result, according to him, were misleading the public and making their lives unpleasant.
Therefore, the New Deal, in Huey Long's opinion, was as perplexing as star studies in its complexity. He claimed that the new laws created as a result were deceiving the populace and making their lives miserable.
Know more about the New Deal here:
https://brainly.com/question/936437
#SPJ4
Complete question:
Use the excerpt from Huey P. Long's "Share Our Wealth" speech, given on March 12, 1935, to answer the question.
And they proceeded with the NRA. Everything from a peanut stand to a powerhouse had to have a separate book of rules and laws to regulate what they did. If a peanut stand started to parch a sack of goobers for sale, they had to be careful to go through the rule book. One slip and he went to jail. A little fellow who pressed a pair of pants went to jail because he charged 5 cents under the price set in the rule
book. So they wrote their NRA rule book, codes, laws, etc. They got up over 900 of them. One would be as thick as an unabridged dictionary and as confusing as a study of the stars. It would take 40 lawyers to tell a shoe-shine stand how to operate and be certain he didn't go to jail. In 3-5 sentences, analyze Huey Long's criticism of the New Deal. Cite specific details in the excerpt to support your analysis.
What contributions did America make to the war effort in ww1?
As the U.S. military enlisted young men, civilians were asked to contribute by purchasing War bonds, giving to charities, or, if they worked in industry, going above and beyond for the troops.
Beginning in 1917, the U.S. provided its largest financial and material contributions. The American Expeditionary Force (AEF) commander-in-chief General of the Armies John Pershing led American troops to theBy 1944, America was the world leader in the production of weaponry and had more than enough to meet all of its military needs. At the same time, the US was sending vitally needed supplies to its friends in the Soviet Union and Great Britain. Many Americans volunteered to defend the nation against bombing or invasion by the enemy.To learn more about World war here
https://brainly.com/question/446364
#SPJ4
what was darwins theroy of evelution
Explanation:
Darwin proposed that species can change over time, that new species come from pre-existing species, and that all species share a common ancestor. In this model, each species has its own unique set of heritable (genetic) differences from the common ancestor, which have accumulated gradually over very long time periods.
Answer:
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, also known as the theory of natural selection, is the idea that all species of organisms have evolved over time through a process of descent with modification. According to this theory, populations of organisms change over the course of generations through a process of natural selection, in which some individuals are more successful at reproducing and passing on their traits to the next generation than others. These traits, which can be physical or behavioral, are passed on through the genes that are passed from one generation to the next. Over time, the frequency of these traits in the population may change as a result of this process of selection, leading to the evolution of new species.
In addition to newly freed people, who else might have been refugees in the South?
Congress created the Freedmen's Bureau, officially known as the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen, and Abandoned Lands, in 1865 to aid the millions of emancipated African slaves.
What happened to slaves after they were freed?Some recently freed slaves promptly left the area where they lived, while others worked as wage workers for their former masters. Most crucially, African Americans had the freedom to decide for themselves where and what kind of employment they would do.
Following the Civil War, life for many freedmen in the South was not socially egalitarian, with many of them inhabiting the lowest social strata. In the South, racism was still pervasive and even institutionalised. The Freedmen's Bureau had its greatest success in the area of education.
To know more about Freedmen, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16816388
#SPJ1
In their search for gold, mountain men explored much new territory in the West. True or false and explain why.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The mountain men were a group of fur traders and explorers who roamed the mountains and valleys of the American West in the early 19th century in search of beaver pelts, which were highly prized for their use in the production of hats. In the course of their activities, the mountain men explored much of the uncharted territory in the West, including the Rocky Mountains, the Great Basin, and the Sierra Nevada. They were some of the first Europeans to set foot in many of these areas and helped to open up the West to further exploration and settlement. The search for gold was also an important motivation for some mountain men, as they hoped to strike it rich by discovering gold deposits in the region.
Landry, a twenty-five year old man, notices that a woman left her wallet at a table in a coffee shop. He steals the wallet and all of the money inside. Of which crime is Landry guilty?
A.
larceny
B.
assault
C.
burglary
D.
vandalism
F
The answer is A: larceny
.Larceny is a form of crime that involves taking the property of another person or business unlawfully. This form of crime has been broken down into more precise definitions that certain jurisdictions around the world have implemented (like robbery, burglary, and theft), but in some countries, like in the USA, it is still an offense that involves, very precisely, the taking of somebody else´s property and carrying it away with you.
Which of these might cause workers
to strike?
A. Affirmative action
B. Consumer protection
C. A labor dispute
D.
Environmental protection
A legal fight one of the reasons mentioned why workers go on strike, per the provided statement.
What is the most accurate way to define environment?The effects of all living and non-living entities on human life could well be epitomized as the environment. River, land, moonlight, rocks, and breath are examples of non-living or environmental components, whereas all living or biotic elements include animals, plants, flowers, fisheries, and birds.
Why is the environment so crucial?Human health and happiness are directly impacted by the state of the environment. Good natural surroundings give spiritual and psychological inputs for business, clean air and water, fertile ground for producing food, and so on.
To know more about Environmental visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12275614
#SPJ1
HELP!!! I'M GIVING 100 POINTS FOR THIS AND A BRAINLIEST
Complete the chart below. For each effect, identify and explain it in 2-3 complete sentences.
Old world (Europe, Africa, and/or Asia
Political Short-term effect:
Political long-term effect:
Economic short-term effects:
Economic Long-term effects:
New World (The Americas and Carribean)
Political Short-term effect:
Political long-term effect:
Economic short-term effects:
Economic Long-term effects:
Old World (Europe, Africa, and/or Asia)
Political Short-term effect: The Old World experienced a significant expansion of European colonial empires, as European powers sought to gain control over new territories and resources. This led to the conquest and colonization of many parts of the world, and had significant political effects on the societies and governments of the colonized regions.
Political long-term effect: The long-term political effects of colonialism included the establishment of new forms of government, such as colonial administrations and puppet states, and the creation of new social and economic systems that often benefited the colonizers at the expense of the indigenous populations. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the political landscape of many countries in the Old World and around the globe.
Economic short-term effects: The economic effects of colonialism were varied, but in general, the colonizers benefited greatly from the exploitation of natural resources and the labor of the colonized peoples. This often led to a concentration of wealth and power in the hands of the colonizers, while the colonized societies often experienced economic disruption and decline.
Economic Long-term effects: In the long term, the economic effects of colonialism were often mixed. While some colonized countries were able to develop strong economies and become major players in the global economy, others were left with fragile economies and a dependence on the colonizers for trade and resources. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the economic landscape of many countries in the Old World and around the globe.
New World (The Americas and Caribbean)
Political Short-term effect: The arrival of European colonizers in the New World had significant political effects on the indigenous populations of the Americas and the Caribbean. Many indigenous societies were conquered and subjugated by the Europeans, and their political systems and forms of governance were largely dismantled.
Political long-term effect: The long-term political effects of European colonization in the New World included the establishment of new forms of government, such as colonial administrations and later independent states, as well as the continued influence of European political systems and values on the political development of the region. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the political landscape of many countries in the New World.
Economic short-term effects: The economic effects of European colonization in the New World were largely negative for the indigenous populations, as they lost control over their lands and resources and were often exploited for labor. The colonizers, on the other hand, benefited greatly from the exploitation of natural resources and the labor of the indigenous peoples, and the region became an important source of wealth for the European powers.
Economic Long-term effects: In the long term, the economic effects of European colonization in the New World were mixed. Some countries in the region were able to develop strong economies and become major players in the global economy, while others were left with fragile economies and a dependence on foreign trade and investment. The legacy of colonialism continues to shape the economic landscape of many countries in the New World.
Answer:
Old World:
Political Short-Term Effect: The transfer of diseases can negatively impact the interactions between governments due to the fear of spreading diseases. This cause could harm the political powers that lie within the government.
Political Long-Term Effect: The government couldn't run its course because of the diseases. They feared them and the harm that they could cause so there wasn't much ruling going on. within the government.
Economic Short-Term Effect: The spread of diseases could affect trade because it could spread to the or animals that are being traded. This could lead to less money being ma from trade and could harm the economy.
Economic Long-Term Effect: Diseases like smallpox that came about not only affected the people but the environment. Some plants and animals got these diseases and becaus this the economy began to fail. They didn't have any crops to trade and so they weren't making any money and they had less laborers working because of the diseases and so this is another reason they weren't being able to make money.
New World:
Political Short-Term Effect: Since the age of exploration was prompted by many events in Europe the New Worlds were introduced to rising of nationalism, capitalism, and the mercantile system. These were going to be used to help them build up their empires in the New World.
Political Long-Term Effect: In the New World, the empires that were being built used the three new ideas that were introduced to them, and this led the colonies established by the Spanish to create a system called the encomienda system. It caused the French and the Spanish to encourage settlement and the religious conversion of the natives in their colonies. It led the English to encourage large-scale settlement in colonies, they didn't develop a system of native slavery, and they wanted to acquire land the same way they did in England and to meet that the British colonists were allowed to govern themselves.
Economic Short-Term Effect: New goods were being brought to the New World that they didn't have before. This led to new goods being able to be traded and this was good for the economy. because trade would have increased allowing them to make more money.
Economic Long-Term Effect: When trade increased because of the new goods being traded more and more people came to the New World and stayed there. The new goods and the new people that came caused the New World's economy to shift toward capitalism.
Explanation: